
There are many things that are more than a little unsettling about the Mormon Church. As I previously reported here on The Stew, the Mormon Church still has racist overtones, and they did not allow African Americans to hold positions in the church until the late 1970′s.
This latest bit of creepiness is really over the top, though. It seems that the Mormon Church has posthumously baptized Barack Obama’s dead mother, confirmed by ABC News, and originally reported by AMERICAblog.
On June 4, 2008, Stanley Ann Dunham, the president’s mother, was posthumously baptized by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. She died in 1995 at the age of 52 from cancer. She was always described as a non-religious person in life, and was a self-proclaimed spiritualist, though she remained skeptical of all religions. Words used to describe her views on religion were agnostic, atheist, and secular humanist. Apparently, this was not good enough for the LDS church, and they saw fit to violate her in death when she could not defend herself. This was done in 2008 while her son, Barack Obama, won enough delegates to snag the Democratic nomination for President.
Here is what The Huffington Post had to say on the matter:
The baptism was first reported by AMERICAblog’s John Aravosis, who found an ordinance record on the Mormon genealogical Web site, FamilySearch.org.
Mormon Church spokeswoman Kim Farah said that “the offering of baptism to our deceased ancestors is a sacred practice to us and it is counter to Church policy for a Church member to submit names for baptism for persons to whom they are not related. The Church is looking into the circumstances of how this happened and does not yet have all the facts. However, this is a serious matter and we are treating it as such.”
According to “doctrinal background” from an LDS spokesman, “well-meaning Church members sometimes bypass this instruction and submit the names of non-relatives for temple baptism. Others — perhaps pranksters or careless persons — have submitted the names of unrelated famous or infamous people, or even wholly fictitious names. These rare acts are contrary to Church policy and sometimes cause pain and embarrassment.”
Even if this is “not church practice,” the people doing it need to stop it. Further, I find that to be no excuse, since everyone, by the time this happened, knew who Barack Obama’s mother was. They did this to cause pain and humiliation to Ms. Dunham’s surviving relatives, and to take a shot at the first African American Presidential nominee. Disgraceful is what this practice is, no matter the twisted reasons they present as justification.
This is not the first time the Mormon Church has baptized people posthumously. There was quite a bit of controversy over their baptizing of dead Holocaust victims. CBS News reported on that in February of this year:
Mormon church leaders apologized to the family of Holocaust survivor and Jewish rights advocate Simon Wiesenthal after his parents were posthumously baptized, a controversial ritual that Mormons believe allows deceased people a way to the afterlife but offends members of many other religions.
Wiesenthal died in 2005 after surviving the Nazi death camps and spending his life documenting Holocaust crimes and hunting down perpetrators who remained at large. Jews are particularly offended by an attempt to alter the religion of Holocaust victims, who were murdered because of their religion, and the baptism of Holocaust survivors was supposed to have been barred by a 1995 agreement.
Yet records indicate Wiesenthal’s parents, Asher and Rosa Rapp Wiesenthal, were baptized in proxy ceremonies performed by Mormon church members at temples in Arizona and Utah in late January.
In a statement, the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center denounced the baptismal rites.
“We are outraged that such insensitive actions continue in the Mormon temples,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean at the center.
The church immediately apologized, saying it was the actions of an individual member of church — whom they did not name — that led to the submission of Wiesenthal’s name.
“We sincerely regret that the actions of an individual member of the church led to the inappropriate submission of these names,” Michael Purdy, a spokesman for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, said in a statement issued Monday. “We consider this a serious breach of our protocol and we have suspended indefinitely this person’s ability to access our genealogy records.”
But, there is hope of reversing this ridiculously offensive practice of posthumously baptizing people who would have wanted nothing to do with Mormonism. Comedian Bill Maher has the answer: unbaptism. As the Stew previously reported, Ann Romney’s father, Roger Davies, was an inventor, an engineer, and a staunch atheist who hated religion. However, 14 months after his death, the Romney’s baptized him in the Mormon tradition. It is more than obvious that Davies would not have wanted this, but they did it anyway, because they have no respect whatsoever for the wishes of others. So, Maher unbaptized Roger Davies on his show Real Time With Bill Maher. I think that, since Mormons seem to be more than willing to do what they would like to others, no matter what that person would have wanted, we should have a whole lot more unbaptisms, starting with Stanley Ann Dunham.






i was going to voice my opinion on this subject…but i find it disrespectful, humiliating, inconsiderate, uncaring, they are taking this a bit too far,,,they have gone over the boundaries of good taste…to no taste at all…
You have voiced your opinion in a concise manner, and I agree with your post.
My (above) remark is of course to Peonies’ comment.
Although I believe that every religion is guilty of preying on those who pray for the sake of financial gain, the Church of Lamer Day “Saints” has really crossed the line with their baptism of Dr. Ann Dunham. President Obama’s mother had the right to be agnostic (none of us knows for certain if God actually exists or not), and the behavior of the Mormons has gone beyond being creepy; it is totally disrespectful to the memory of someone who was as singular and intelligent as Dr. Ann Dunham, and the Moromon cult should be punished for their ignorance. I can’t think of a better way for the president to respond than by revoking the tax-exempt status of Mormonism. It is still not fully understood by the average American that Mormonism is merely a cult that was founded by a man who was a charlatan, a fraud, a polygamist, a pathological liar, and a criminal (Joseph Smith was wanted by the authorities in New York, Missouri, and Illinois where he was accused of treason). It makes sense that Mittwit Romney is a compulsive liar because he learned this dishonesty through his worship of Joseph Smith, who is more of a prophet and messiah to Mormons than Jesus Christ. However, Smith was merely a false prophet who was attempting to profit from an ability to dupe his followers; Romney is attempting the same scheme in 2012.
Paul Haider, Chicago
There are many disturbing things about just about every religion IMO. I’v done a lot of research into the histories of all of the big three. Not only do I not believe it, but I am more than a little disturbed by many of the beliefs and practices. But this crosses the line in a major way. You are right it is grossly disrespectful.
As for the president revoking the tax exempt status. his opponent is a Mormon. All hell would break loose, so he can’t do that now.
Hey, they’ll baptize anybody, as long as they’re dead. They are the only ones I know of who baptize the dead, but other churches have some very strange baptism rules too. Yes, beinf baptized when you’re dead is irritating but since it has no real effect on you I would tend to laugh it off.
I think for me its a respect thing. I can’t laugh it off because it is simply disrespectful of who that person was. That is the arrogance that is the hallmark of religion. They and they alone are right, and they will make you one of them, make you live by their rules, whether you want to or not, even in DEATH. Despicable.
Some years ago, Mormon relatives of mine held a baptism service for my brother who died in Vietnam. At that time, I didn’t speak up, for which I’m sorry now. It is unconscionable that they perform such rites without the consent or, sometimes, even the knowledge of family members. As an atheist, a part of me says, “So what? It doesn’t mean anything after all.” But the other part of me is incensed at the gall the Mormon Church expresses toward everyone not of their faith.
Fellow atheist, here. We agree wholeheartedly. I am incensed at this practice.